Skip to main content
Glama
Jatin-IITB

Open Food Facts MCP Server

by Jatin-IITB

advancedSearch

Filter food products by category, brand, Nutri-Score, Eco-Score, NOVA group, allergens, labels, and country to find products matching specific criteria.

Instructions

Advanced product search with multiple filters: category, brand, nutri-score, eco-score, NOVA group, allergen-free, labels, country

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryNoSearch query (product name, ingredients, etc.)
categoryNoFilter by category
brandNoFilter by brand
nutriscoreGradeNoFilter by Nutri-Score grade
ecoscoreGradeNoFilter by Eco-Score grade
novaGroupNoFilter by NOVA group (food processing level)
allergenFreeNoFilter by allergen-free (e.g., "gluten", "milk", "eggs")
labelsNoFilter by labels (e.g., "organic", "fair-trade", "vegan")
countriesNoFilter by country (e.g., "united-states", "france")
sortByNo
pageNo
pageSizeNo
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and description only lists filters. It does not disclose important behavioral traits such as read-only nature, rate limits, authentication needs, or pagination behavior beyond what is in the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise single sentence, front-loaded with purpose. No unnecessary words, but could be slightly more structured with bullet points for readability.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 12 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is insufficient. It omits pagination, sorting, and result format, leaving significant gaps for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 75%, so most parameters are already described. Description lists several filter parameters but adds no new meaning beyond repeating names. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Advanced product search' and lists multiple filter categories, distinguishing it from single-filter siblings like searchByBrand or searchByCategory. However, 'advanced' is somewhat vague; could be more specific about combining filters.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs. alternatives. It does not mention when to prefer this over simpler searches or provide exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Jatin-IITB/openproductsfacts-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server