No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 28 tools
The geometry tools (extrude, revolve, sweep, hole, round, chamfer, shell, pattern, datum_plane, sketch_curve) each target a clearly distinct modelling operation, and the lifecycle tools (new/open/save/close/info) map to distinct verbs. The weakest spots are inspection tools—model_info, list_dimensions and measure all return quantitative facts about the same model—and preview_image vs. view_set vs. model_export image, which require reading the trailing text to separate. Long, near-identical boilerplate preambles on most tools also bury the discriminating sentence, making selection slower than it should be.
There is a recognizable noun_verb family (model_new, model_open, model_save, model_close, model_info, model_export, dimension_edit, feature_suppress, feature_resume, feature_xml_export, view_set) but it is mixed with bare nouns (extrude, revolve, hole, round, chamfer, shell, sweep, pattern, undo, measure) and verb_noun forms (list_dimensions, find_geometry, delete_feature). The pattern is readable but not predictable, so an agent cannot reliably guess a name from an intent.
28 tools is on the heavy side, but CAD modelling legitimately spans many feature types, and each geometry tool covers a distinct kernel operation rather than duplicating another. The count is inflated somewhat by the multi-action multiplexed tools (model_export, dimension_edit) plus advanced XML escape hatches, which keeps it just over the comfortable range.
The set covers the full part-modelling lifecycle: create/open/save/close, core solid features, patterns, datums, editing (dimension_edit, delete_feature, suppress/resume, undo), inspection (model_info, measure, find_geometry, preview_image) and export/import via XML. Gaps are acknowledged but real: there is no mirror tool, no assembly mating constraints, and model_new's description points at a 'model_edit action=assemble' tool that does not exist in this surface, a dead end for assembly building.