weeek_create_tasks

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It reveals important behavior: returns a per-item report and does not abort the entire batch on a single bad name (partial failure). This is valuable beyond the input schema. It does not detail other aspects like authentication or rate limits, but for a batch create operation, the partial-failure semantics are the most critical.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with purpose, followed by a critical behavioral note. Every word earns its place; no redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has a nested array parameter and no output schema, but the description covers the essential context: batch operation, per-item return report, and partial-failure behavior. It does not describe the exact report structure or error formats, but for a create-only tool with a clear schema, the given information is largely sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate by explaining parameters. It mentions 'tasks' implicitly through the tool name and 'Create many WEEEK tasks,' but it provides no details about required fields, types, or semantics. The schema shows required 'title' and 'project' for each item, but the description adds no guidance on these or any other parameter, leaving the agent to infer everything from the schema alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Create many WEEEK tasks in one call.' It uses a specific verb ('Create') and resource ('WEEEK tasks'), and distinguishes from siblings like weeek_create_task by emphasizing bulk operation ('many', 'in one call').

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for bulk task creation ('Create many... in one call') but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus the singular weeek_create_task, nor does it mention any exclusions or prerequisites. The context is clear but lacks explicit alternative guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.