weeek-mcp-smart
Related Servers
Alternatives to weeek-mcp-smart
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for WEEEK Public API v1 enabling management of tasks, projects, boards, tags, custom fields, time tracking, and CRM entities.10035 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceFull-featured MCP server integrating all 71 endpoints of the Weeek API as MCP tools for AI clients, enabling task, project, and workspace management via natural language.3-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceLocal, read-only-by-default MCP server for Weeek that connects AI clients to your workspace over stdio, enabling listing projects, tasks, boards, members, and tags with opt-in write tools for task management.1035 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for the Weeek Public API. Use it from Cursor or Claude Code to browse projects, search tasks, read attachments, and (with a browser session) load task comments.35 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for TickTick API enabling task management, project organization, habit tracking, and more.20 npm73MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for workspace kanban boards, enabling board operations like get, add, update, move, delete cards and columns.8-
TDQS
Scored across 12 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource/action: version, project listing, member listing, task CRUD, batch creation, deletion, completion, moving, and file attachment. Even create_task vs create_tasks are clearly separated by singular/plural and batch semantics. No two tools appear to overlap in purpose.
Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (list_projects, create_task, update_task, delete_task, complete_task, move_task, attach_file). The single deviation is weeek_version, which uses a noun instead of get_version, but this is minor and understandable for a status endpoint.
12 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each tool serves a distinct, necessary function for the WEEEK task management domain. The count feels appropriately scoped without unnecessary duplication or bloat.
The toolset thoroughly covers the task lifecycle: create (single/batch), get/list, update (title/due), complete/reopen, move, delete, and file attachment, plus member lookup for assignment. Minor gaps include no project creation or explicit column listing, but these can be worked around via the create_task/move_task name-or-id parameters and are likely outside the server's intended scope.