Skip to main content
Glama
Igniral

Igniral MCP Server

Official
by Igniral

igniral_update_dynamic_endpoint

Modify the schema, methods, or security configuration of an existing dynamic API endpoint to update its behavior.

Instructions

Updates a dynamic API endpoint within an existing application. Requires an endpointId from a previous list_applications call.

Use this to modify the schema or configuration of an already existing endpoint.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
endpointIdYesID of the endpoint to update
applicationIdYesID of the application the endpoint belongs to
endpointPathYesURL path for the endpoint (e.g., '/products', '/users', '/orders'). Must start with / and use lowercase letters, numbers, and hyphens.
allowedMethodsYesHTTP methods to enable: ['GET', 'POST', 'PUT', 'DELETE']. Include all methods the endpoint should support.
schemaDefinitionYesJSON Schema defining the data structure for this endpoint. Must include "$schema", "type": "object", and "properties". Each property needs a type (string, number, integer, boolean, array, object).
typeNoEndpoint type: 'JSON' for data APIs (default), 'FILE' for file uploads
visibilityNoEndpoint visibility: 'PRIVATE' (default, requires auth) or 'PUBLIC' (accessible without auth, only for public apps)
securityPolicyNoData access control: 'NONE' (shared data), 'OWNER_ONLY' (users see only their data), 'CLAIM_FILTER' (filter by JWT claims, requires securityConfig)
securityConfigNoRequired when securityPolicy is 'CLAIM_FILTER'. Defines which JWT claim maps to which data field for filtering.
endpointDocumentationNoHuman-readable documentation for this endpoint
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states it 'updates' and 'modifies the schema or configuration' without detailing whether it performs a partial patch or full replacement, any side effects, authorization needs, or response format. This lack of behavioral context is a significant gap for an update operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two concise sentences, front-loading the primary action and a key prerequisite. There is no redundancy or filler, and it efficiently conveys the core purpose. However, it could be slightly more structured with separate usage notes.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 10 parameters and no output schema or annotations, the description is too sparse. It fails to explain important aspects like idempotency, partial update behavior, response structure, or error conditions. The description leaves the agent with insufficient behavioral and operational context for a complex update tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds minimal semantic value beyond the schema, merely echoing that it modifies schema or configuration. It does not explain how parameters relate to each other or provide usage examples, leaving the schema to carry the full burden.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Updates' and the resource 'dynamic API endpoint', specifying it operates within an existing application. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'create_dynamic_endpoint' by focusing on modification of an already existing endpoint, and explicitly mentions the prerequisite of an endpointId from list_applications.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates when to use the tool (to modify an existing endpoint) and mentions a prerequisite (endpointId from list_applications). However, it does not explicitly exclude alternative tools for different scenarios, such as creating a new endpoint, which is left implicit given the sibling tool names.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Igniral/igniral-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server