Skip to main content
Glama
Igniral

Igniral MCP Server

Official
by Igniral

igniral_create_dynamic_endpoint

Creates a dynamic API endpoint for an existing application, defining its data schema, HTTP methods, visibility, and security policy.

Instructions

Creates a dynamic API endpoint within an existing application. Requires an applicationId from a previous igniral_create_application call.

Use this iteratively to add all needed endpoints to the application. Each endpoint defines its data schema (JSON Schema format), HTTP methods, visibility (PUBLIC/PRIVATE), and security policy.

Security policies:

  • NONE: Anyone with role permissions sees all data

  • OWNER_ONLY: Users only see data they created (most common for personal data)

  • CLAIM_FILTER: Filter data based on JWT claims (requires securityConfig)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
applicationIdYesID of the application to add the endpoint to
endpointPathYesURL path for the endpoint (e.g., '/products', '/users', '/orders'). Must start with / and use lowercase letters, numbers, and hyphens.
allowedMethodsYesHTTP methods to enable: ['GET', 'POST', 'PUT', 'DELETE']. Include all methods the endpoint should support.
schemaDefinitionYesJSON Schema defining the data structure for this endpoint. Must include "$schema", "type": "object", and "properties". Each property needs a type (string, number, integer, boolean, array, object).
typeNoEndpoint type: 'JSON' for data APIs (default), 'FILE' for file uploads
visibilityNoEndpoint visibility: 'PRIVATE' (default, requires auth) or 'PUBLIC' (accessible without auth, only for public apps)
securityPolicyNoData access control: 'NONE' (shared data), 'OWNER_ONLY' (users see only their data), 'CLAIM_FILTER' (filter by JWT claims, requires securityConfig)
securityConfigNoRequired when securityPolicy is 'CLAIM_FILTER'. Defines which JWT claim maps to which data field for filtering.
endpointDocumentationNoHuman-readable documentation for this endpoint
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It discloses the creation action, required parameters, and explains security policies with their implications. It does not describe failure modes, rate limits, or detailed auth flows, but the iterative use and policy explanations add substantial behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured: purpose first, then prerequisites, usage pattern, and options. It is concise without being overly terse, and each sentence adds meaningful context. A slight improvement could be more front-loaded with security policy overview.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 9 parameters (4 required), no output schema, and no annotations, the description provides adequate context: how to use iteratively, what to provide, and policy details. It omits return values and error conditions, but the core workflow is clearly explained.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds value by explaining how parameters interact, e.g., 'securityPolicy' with 'securityConfig', and provides high-level context for 'schemaDefinition' (JSON Schema format). This goes beyond the schema's individual parameter descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb-resource ('Creates a dynamic API endpoint') and explicitly ties it to an existing application, distinguishing it from siblings like 'igniral_update_dynamic_endpoint' and 'igniral_create_application'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description specifies the prerequisite ('Requires an applicationId from a previous igniral_create_application call') and recommends iterative use ('Use this iteratively to add all needed endpoints'). It lacks explicit when-not-to-use guidance but provides sufficient operational context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Igniral/igniral-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server