inventory_scan

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description does not disclose whether the tool is read-only, has side effects, or requires special permissions. Only lists output categories without behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence covering all key points without redundancy. Could be slightly more structured (e.g., separate lines for each component) but is acceptably concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given one optional parameter and no output schema, the description adequately defines the tool's scope. However, lacks usage context and behavioral details, which are needed for full completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Single parameter 'server' with schema description 'Remote server name from config (optional, runs locally if omitted)' adds meaning beyond the schema, clarifying config dependency and default behavior.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'collect server inventory/topology' with specific items (system status, Docker containers, ports). Distinguishes from siblings like system_status and docker_list by combining multiple data sources, but 'topology' is vague.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like system_status, docker_list, or network_scan. Does not indicate prerequisites or when to prefer inventory_scan.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.