homebutler
Related Servers
Alternatives to homebutler
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for homelab diagnostics + auto-update pipeline, managing Docker hosts via SSH with read-only diagnostics, image-drift visibility, and automated update execution with rollback.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP servers for managing homelab infrastructure. Monitor Docker/Podman containers, Ollama AI models, Pi-hole DNS, Unifi networks, and Ansible inventory.42MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server and CLI for host and container operations, enabling Docker and Compose control, SSH, host inspection, logs, ZFS, and safe file transfer. It exposes flux and scout MCP tools with parity from the original TypeScript server.2AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvider-agnostic MCP server for managing heterogeneous infrastructure (SSH, Proxmox VE, Virtualizor, Hetzner Cloud, Cloudflare) via a JSON inventory, exposing tools for VM/container management, DNS, firewalls, and SSH operations.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA self-hosted MCP server for homelabs with ~193 tools covering media, home automation, productivity, infrastructure, and public APIs, featuring a web dashboard for configuration and health monitoring.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA single MCP server that gives an AI assistant comprehensive access to manage a homelab, including SSH, Docker, Proxmox, Synology, Cloudflare, and more, with 85 tools and a centralized configuration.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 44 tools
Most tools have sharply distinct purposes, and descriptions explicitly cross-reference siblings (install_uninstall vs install_purge, backup_list vs backup_drill) to steer selection. However a few boundaries blur, notably doctor/report (both produce health diagnoses), install_status vs install_list, and system_status vs docker_stats vs inventory_scan, which could be confused.
Names follow a largely predictable prefix_verb/noun scheme grouped by subsystem (docker_*, install_*, backup_*, watch_*, proxmox_*), each readable and consistent within its group. Minor deviations exist in bare noun tools (alerts, doctor, report, processes, wake) that break the otherwise uniform convention.
At 44 tools this is heavy, and the surface spans many subsystems (docker, proxmox, backups, installs, watching, network, reporting) so the total is large rather than redundant. Most tools earn their place, but the sheer count raises discovery and misselection cost.
Coverage is broad and deep: full docker control, backup lifecycle including restore and verification, install lifecycle, proxmox guest management, and monitoring/watching. The one obvious dead end is that docker_stop has no docker_start (acknowledged in the description), leaving containers needing an out-of-band start.