Skip to main content
Glama
HenricTBoehm

PADC Evidence Lab

by HenricTBoehm

Related Servers

Alternatives to PADC Evidence Lab

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI applications to submit claims, decisions, and evidence so it maintains a typed state model of beliefs, conflicts, changes, and next actions, preserving claim lineage and semantic evidence across versioned persistence.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to query a single-source ontology of types, entities, statements, evidence, and controlled vocabulary, including bitemporal "as of" and "as recorded" fact lookups. Supports writing by letting agents propose candidate statements while keeping approval, review transitions, and authoritative reasoning restricted to approved facts.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables software agents to maintain a signed, evidence-aware local ledger of claims, with policy-gated proposals, conflict queries, and constitution-pinned access through an MCP stdio server.
      7
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to run disciplined hunts over public data, enforcing evidence ledgers, calibration controls, novelty checks against catalogues and literature, and fresh-eyes review before any claim is trusted. Human-only decisions such as waivers and expert attestations stay out of reach of the agent.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to analyze a repository evidence-first, answering questions as verifiable claims with source evidence, targeted test observations, and reference resolution.
      5
      3
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct phase of the evidence workflow: source listing, evidence search, document review, assessment validation, and matrix building. The descriptions clarify non-overlapping boundaries, especially around server-derived fields and structural versus semantic validation.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All names use a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: list_sources, find_evidence, run_document_review, validate_evidence_assessment, build_evidence_matrix. No mixed conventions or vague verbs appear.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a specialized evidence-lab server. Each tool has a clear, non-redundant role in the workflow, and the count avoids both thinness and bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core evidence lifecycle from listing sources through search, review, validation, and matrix building. Minor gaps exist around source ingestion/management and semantic query execution, though the latter is explicitly deferred in the version notes.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues