Skip to main content
Glama

hemmabo_search_availability

Read-onlyIdempotent

Confirm property availability for requested dates with conflict details and alternative date windows. Use after selecting a property to verify before requesting a quote.

Instructions

Check whether a specific property is available for the requested dates. Use this tool after the user has selected a property from hemmabo_search_properties and wants to confirm availability before getting a quote. Do NOT use for general browsing — use hemmabo_search_properties instead. Returns available=true/false with conflict details and same-month alternative date windows when unavailable. Use the propertyId from search with the exact checkIn/checkOut range; omit guests to check dates only, or pass it to get host-source totals for that party size in the returned alternative windows.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
guestsNoOptional guest count (e.g. 4). Omit when only checking date availability without pricing. When provided, alternative date windows in the response include live host-source totals for that guest count.
checkInYesArrival date in ISO 8601 calendar format YYYY-MM-DD (e.g. '2026-07-15'). Must be today or later in the property's timezone. Must be strictly before checkOut; together they define the stay length used for pricing and availability.
checkOutYesDeparture date in ISO 8601 calendar format YYYY-MM-DD (e.g. '2026-07-22'). Must be strictly after checkIn on the same calendar. The guest does not stay the departure night.
propertyIdYesStable property UUID from hemmabo_search_properties (e.g. '550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440000'). Pass the exact UUID string — never a property name, host domain, or booking URL.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNoPresent only when isError=true.
reasonNoReason when available=false.
checkInNo
checkOutNo
availableYesTrue if the property is bookable for the entire range.
propertyIdNo
alternativeDatesNoNearby same-month date windows to offer when the requested dates are unavailable.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and idempotentHint=true, so the description's burden is reduced. However, it adds context like returning conflict details and alternative date windows when unavailable, plus the effect of the guests parameter. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with purpose, then provides usage guidance, then return details, then parameter specifics. Each sentence adds value with no redundancy. It is concise yet comprehensive.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that an output schema exists, the description appropriately summarizes return values. It covers when to use, parameter roles, and behavioral details. No missing context for an effective agent invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but the description adds extra meaning beyond schema descriptions. It specifies that propertyId comes from search, checkIn/checkOut must be exact, and that mentioning guests affects alternative windows. This aids correct invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description starts with 'Check whether a specific property is available for the requested dates,' using a specific verb and resource. It clearly distinguishes from the sibling tool 'hemmabo_search_properties' by stating not to use for general browsing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly states when to use: 'Use this tool after the user has selected a property from hemmabo_search_properties and wants to confirm availability before getting a quote.' It also says when not to use: 'Do NOT use for general browsing — use hemmabo_search_properties instead.' Provides context on return values and parameter usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/HemmaBo-se/hemmabo-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server