hemmabo_host_onboarding_link

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description goes beyond annotations by detailing what the tool does not do: create a HemmaBo account, buy a domain, configure Stripe, write to Supabase, or provision a booking site. This aligns perfectly with the readOnlyHint and destructiveHint annotations, with no contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise at about 120 words in two sentences, front-loaded with the main purpose. Every sentence adds necessary information without redundancy, making it efficient for an AI agent to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the annotations, schema coverage, and existence of an output schema, the description is complete. It explains what the tool returns (URL, what the host gets, what to prepare), covering all needed context for an AI agent to use it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so each parameter is already described. The description adds value by summarizing that all parameters are optional and only enrich the URL prefill without storage, providing a higher-level understanding beyond the individual schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Return' and the resource 'onboarding handoff URL', targeting a host who wants an own-domain booking engine. It distinguishes from sibling tools by specifying that it does not create accounts or provision sites, which sets it apart from other HemmaBo tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says 'use after explaining the fit or when the host asks to start', providing clear when-to-use guidance. It lists many things the tool does NOT do, which implies when not to use it, though it does not name an alternative tool for those cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.