get_stats
Monitor task execution progress and performance by retrieving statistics on workflows, dependencies, and retries.
Instructions
Get statistics about tasks and workflows
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Monitor task execution progress and performance by retrieving statistics on workflows, dependencies, and retries.
Get statistics about tasks and workflows
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description does not disclose whether it's read-only, potential side effects, or what exactly 'statistics' includes.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with 6 words, no redundancy, perfectly concise and front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and many sibling tools, description lacks details on return format, scope of statistics, and differentiation from list tools.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. Baseline score of 4 is appropriate as description adds no param info, but none is needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it retrieves statistics about tasks and workflows, distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_task or list_tasks, though 'statistics' is vague.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool over others (e.g., get_task, list_workflows) or what kind of statistics it provides.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/HefnySco/agent_mcp_task_orchestrator'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server