Skip to main content
Glama
HefnySco

Task Orchestrator MCP Server

by HefnySco

execute_task

Mark a task as completed and record its result to advance the workflow.

Instructions

Mark a task as completed with a result

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesThe ID of the task to execute
resultNoThe result of the task execution
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so description carries full burden. It does not disclose whether the operation is idempotent, what happens if the task is already completed, or if the result is mandatory. Minimal disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence with no unnecessary words or repetition. Efficient and to the point.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite low complexity, the description omits crucial details like return value, side effects, and how this tool relates to siblings. Incomplete for an execution action.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with both parameters described adequately. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, meeting the baseline expectation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: marking a task as completed and attaching a result. It uses a specific verb-resource pair and differentiates from sibling tools like 'fail_task' by implying success.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'fail_task' or 'retry_task'. Missing context on prerequisites or expected usage scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/HefnySco/agent_mcp_task_orchestrator'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server