delete_workflow
Remove a workflow from the system by providing its unique ID.
Instructions
Delete a workflow by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The ID of the workflow to delete |
Remove a workflow from the system by providing its unique ID.
Delete a workflow by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The ID of the workflow to delete |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description does not disclose any behavioral traits like idempotency, cascading effects, or safety. For a deletion tool, this is a major gap.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence without fluff. Efficient for a simple tool, though could benefit from a bit more context.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Minimal description covers the basic action but lacks context on usage among many sibling tools, return values, or error conditions.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema's parameter description. Baseline score of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action 'delete' and resource 'workflow' with method 'by ID'. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like 'delete_task'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives such as 'cleanup_workflow_runs' or 'clear_all'. No prerequisites or restrictions mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/HefnySco/agent_mcp_sequential_thinking'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server