Skip to main content
Glama
HeetVekariya

Linear Regression MCP

by HeetVekariya

label_encode_categorical_columns

Convert categorical data columns into numerical format for linear regression model training by applying label encoding to prepare datasets.

Instructions

This function label encodes all the categorical columns.

Returns: String which confirms success of encoding process.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Implementation Reference

  • server.py:99-99 (registration)
    Registers the label_encode_categorical_columns function as an MCP tool using the FastMCP decorator.
    @mcp.tool()
  • The handler function implements the logic to identify categorical columns in the global data context and apply label encoding to each using LabelEncoder from scikit-learn.
    def label_encode_categorical_columns() -> str:
        """
        This function label encodes all the categorical columns.
    
        Returns:
            String which confirms success of encoding process.
        """
    
        categorical_columns = context.get_data().select_dtypes(include=["object", "category"]).columns
    
        if len(categorical_columns) == 0:
            return "No categorical columns found to encode."
    
        # Initialize the LabelEncoder
        encoder = LabelEncoder()
    
        # Iterate over each categorical column and apply label encoding
        for column in categorical_columns:
            context.get_data()[column] = encoder.fit_transform(context.get_data()[column])
    
        return "All categorical columns have been label encoded successfully."
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It mentions that the tool 'label encodes all the categorical columns' and returns a success confirmation string, but lacks details on behavioral traits such as what 'all' means (e.g., all columns in a dataset, all specified columns), whether it modifies data in-place or creates new output, error handling, or prerequisites. This is inadequate for a mutation tool with zero annotation coverage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief with two sentences, but it's not optimally structured. The first sentence states the purpose, and the second describes the return value. However, it could be more front-loaded with key details (e.g., context or behavior), and the return description is vague ('String which confirms success'). It's concise but lacks efficiency in information delivery.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of a data transformation tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain what 'label encode' entails (e.g., mapping categories to integers), what happens to the encoded data (e.g., stored, returned, or modified), or how errors are handled. This leaves significant gaps for an AI agent to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0 parameters with 100% coverage, so the schema fully documents that no inputs are required. The description doesn't need to add parameter details, but it implies the tool operates on an implicit dataset or context without specifying how that's provided. This minor gap keeps it from a perfect score, but it's largely sufficient given the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool 'label encodes all the categorical columns', which provides a clear verb ('label encodes') and resource ('categorical columns'). However, it doesn't differentiate from sibling tools like 'check_category_columns' or 'get_columns_info', leaving ambiguity about when to use each. The purpose is understandable but lacks sibling distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With siblings like 'check_category_columns' and 'get_columns_info', it's unclear if this should be used before, after, or instead of those tools. No explicit when/when-not statements or alternative references are included.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/HeetVekariya/Linear-Regression-MCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server