Skip to main content
Glama
HeetVekariya

Linear Regression MCP

by HeetVekariya

Related Servers

Alternatives to Linear Regression MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides data visualization and machine learning tools, featuring automated intent-based pipeline routing for data cleaning and model training. It enables LLMs to process CSV or JSON data to generate visual charts, perform regressions, or execute clustering analysis.
      16
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for dataset exploration and analysis, enabling LLM clients to perform summary, correlation, distribution, missing value analysis, data cleaning, and statistical tests directly on CSV files.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents the ability to profile a CSV, define an ML task, tune XGBoost and LightGBM with Optuna, and produce a markdown report with feature importance, all from natural language.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A beginner MCP server that enables Claude to read local text, CSV, and Markdown files. Built as a learning project to understand how to connect AI to local file systems using the MCP protocol.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables training and using machine learning models on local CSV datasets or data from other MCP servers, supporting tasks like forecasting, regression, classification, and anomaly detection.
      -

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes: checking categorical columns, getting column info, label encoding, training a model, and uploading a file. However, 'check_category_columns' and 'get_columns_info' could be slightly confused as both provide column-related information, but their specific focuses (categorical vs. general) help differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The tools use a consistent snake_case format, which is good. However, the naming pattern is mixed: some are verb_noun (e.g., 'upload_file', 'train_linear_regression_model'), while others are noun_verb (e.g., 'check_category_columns', 'get_columns_info', 'label_encode_categorical_columns'). This inconsistency in verb placement reduces predictability.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 5 tools, the count is reasonable for a linear regression server, covering data upload, inspection, preprocessing, and model training. It's slightly thin as it lacks tools for prediction, model evaluation beyond RMSE, or data splitting, but it's well-scoped for basic workflows.

    Completeness3/5

    The toolset covers core steps: data upload, column analysis, encoding, and model training. However, there are notable gaps: no tools for making predictions with the trained model, evaluating model performance beyond RMSE (e.g., R-squared), splitting data into train/test sets, or handling missing values. This limits end-to-end workflow coverage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues