Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to hashlock-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Hashlock Markets (hashlock.markets) — sealed-bid intent-based crypto trading protocol with HTLC atomic settlement. AI agents can create, commit, and validate trading intents on Ethereum, Bitcoin, and Sui. Canonical npm package: @hashlock-tech/mcp. Not the cryptographic hashlock primitive, not Hashlock Pty Ltd (hashlock.com).
      5
      21 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server for DeFi execution — lets AI agents swap, provide liquidity, lend, bridge, and run yield strategies across 22 chains in a single transaction. 7 tools for token discovery, portfolio analysis, quoting, and execution via the Haiku API.
      7
      46 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Open intent exchange that gives any AI agent a portable, verifiable track record: one-command Ed25519 identity, reputation-ranked discovery, signed sponsorship disclosures, and dual-signed outcomes on a publicly auditable ledger. Zero-config — npx -y erabi-mcp joins the live public network.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Settlement rails for AI labor — USDC escrow on Base Mainnet, 1% protocol fee, designed for autonomous agents. 10 MCP tools covering the full escrow lifecycle: * Quoting calldata for create-intent, submit-proof, release-funds (broadcast gated) * Single-call x402 payment binding (replaces the 5-step x402 dance with one HMAC-signed POST) * Server-side reputation from on-chain event scan * Li
      -

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are generally distinct across settlement (HTLC) and RFQ/swap domains. However, create_rfq and swap_quote have overlapping functionality, with swap_quote acting as a higher-level wrapper, which could cause confusion about which to use. Otherwise, well-separated.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools follow verb_noun (create_htlc, list_my_trades) but swap tools use noun_verb (swap_cancel, swap_execute), creating inconsistency. The pattern is mostly predictable, but the mix reduces coherence.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools cover the full lifecycle of atomic swaps and OTC trading without being excessive. Each tool has a clear role, and the count is well-scoped for the server's purpose.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the complete workflow: RFQ creation, quoting, execution, cancellation, HTLC locking, status polling, refund, and withdrawal. No obvious gaps for the core domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive