hashlock-mcp
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to hashlock-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceHashlock Markets (hashlock.markets) — sealed-bid intent-based crypto trading protocol with HTLC atomic settlement. AI agents can create, commit, and validate trading intents on Ethereum, Bitcoin, and Sui. Canonical npm package: @hashlock-tech/mcp. Not the cryptographic hashlock primitive, not Hashlock Pty Ltd (hashlock.com).521 npmMIT
Haiku DeFi MCPofficial
AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for DeFi execution — lets AI agents swap, provide liquidity, lend, bridge, and run yield strategies across 22 chains in a single transaction. 7 tools for token discovery, portfolio analysis, quoting, and execution via the Haiku API.746 npm2MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceOpen intent exchange that gives any AI agent a portable, verifiable track record: one-command Ed25519 identity, reputation-ranked discovery, signed sponsorship disclosures, and dual-signed outcomes on a publicly auditable ledger. Zero-config — npx -y erabi-mcp joins the live public network.1Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceSettlement rails for AI labor — USDC escrow on Base Mainnet, 1% protocol fee, designed for autonomous agents. 10 MCP tools covering the full escrow lifecycle: * Quoting calldata for create-intent, submit-proof, release-funds (broadcast gated) * Single-call x402 payment binding (replaces the 5-step x402 dance with one HMAC-signed POST) * Server-side reputation from on-chain event scan * Li-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server designed for AI agents to perform optimal token swaps on the Sui blockchain.6MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Autonomous Intelligence, enabling AI agents to perform non-custodial, rug-gated multi-chain token swaps including safety checks, quotes, and execution.722 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Tools are generally distinct across settlement (HTLC) and RFQ/swap domains. However, create_rfq and swap_quote have overlapping functionality, with swap_quote acting as a higher-level wrapper, which could cause confusion about which to use. Otherwise, well-separated.
Most tools follow verb_noun (create_htlc, list_my_trades) but swap tools use noun_verb (swap_cancel, swap_execute), creating inconsistency. The pattern is mostly predictable, but the mix reduces coherence.
13 tools cover the full lifecycle of atomic swaps and OTC trading without being excessive. Each tool has a clear role, and the count is well-scoped for the server's purpose.
The tool surface covers the complete workflow: RFQ creation, quoting, execution, cancellation, HTLC locking, status polling, refund, and withdrawal. No obvious gaps for the core domain.