Skip to main content
Glama
Hanzet22
by Hanzet22

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
GITHUB_TOKENNoOptional GitHub fine-grained token with read-only repository Contents and Metadata permissions, used for higher API limits or private repositories.

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
repository_inspectB

Read GitHub repository metadata. Read-only; no code is executed.

repository_treeC

List bounded repository paths from GitHub's Git tree API.

repository_read_fileB

Read one bounded text file from a GitHub repository. No code is executed.

cloudflare_reconnaissance_prepareB

Cloudflare Skill Phase 1 adapter: synthesize four caller-supplied read-only scout reports into run-metadata.json, architecture.md, and a canonical coverage-ledger.json validated by the upstream validator. Does not spawn agents or execute target code.

cloudflare_hunting_wave_prepareA

Cloudflare Skill Phase 2 parent-side planner: validate a canonical ledger, rank planned units deterministically, assign a bounded wave, and explicitly defer untouched units. Does not spawn hunters.

cloudflare_hunter_results_consolidateB

Cloudflare Skill Phase 2 parent-side consolidator: validate structured hunter unit results, ownership, source/local checks and parent-promoted artifact paths, then update only assigned ledger units. Does not execute targets or promote artifacts.

audit_reconnaissanceC

Phase 1: map repository metadata and paths, classify files, and create an initial not-yet-reviewed inventory.

source_security_reviewB

Phase 2/3: generate heuristic source-review candidates. Results are leads only and never confirmed automatically.

cloudflare_coverage_ledger_validateC

Validate a canonical coverage-ledger.json document with Cloudflare Security Audit Skill's upstream validator.

cloudflare_findings_validateC

Validate findings.json against Cloudflare Security Audit Skill's upstream report-schema.json and semantic checks.

audit_coverage_validateC

Phase 2: validate that every in-scope path has exactly one coverage-ledger entry.

audit_findings_validateB

Phase 4: validate finding structure, evidence fields and unique fingerprints. Needs-validation records cannot carry severity.

audit_independent_verifyB

Phase 5: compare findings against separately supplied reviewer checks. This tool does not spawn reviewers or claim independence by itself.

audit_report_generateC

Phase 6: validate coverage and separate reviewer checks, then generate target-neutral Markdown reports.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

B3/5.0

Scored across 14 tools

Disambiguation2/5

Several tools have overlapping or near-duplicate purposes: cloudflare_coverage_ledger_validate vs. audit_coverage_validate, and cloudflare_findings_validate vs. audit_findings_validate. An agent could easily pick the wrong validator or confuse the Cloudflare-specific adapter with the generic audit phase tool, even though descriptions provide some distinction.

Naming Consistency3/5

Most names follow a verb_noun or resource_action pattern, but the set mixes four prefix families: cloudflare_, audit_, repository_, and a standalone source_security_review. The naming is readable but not predictable across the whole server.

Tool Count4/5

Fourteen tools is reasonable for a multi-phase security audit workflow spanning reconnaissance, validation, review, verification, and reporting. The count is slightly inflated by parallel Cloudflare-specific and generic audit validators.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers the audit lifecycle from repository reconnaissance through findings validation, independent verification, and report generation. Minor gaps exist around remediation or code-diff inspection, but core workflows are covered.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues