Skip to main content
Glama
Hanzet22
by Hanzet22

Related Servers

Alternatives to Security Audit MCP Ver

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Evidence-backed, read-only codebase diagnostics for coding agents: secrets, dependency, RLS, and source-impact audits with a verify loop and PR review verdicts. Never writes files or uses the network by default.
      7
      453 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables auditing public GitHub repositories over MCP Streamable HTTP, including classifying URLs, cloning repositories, scanning manifests, CI workflows, and credential signals, and producing findings, file trees, summaries, and PDF reports.
      4 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that produces scored, evidence-cited audits of public GitHub repos via tools for fetching metadata, reading files, scanning git history, and checking hygiene.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Automated security audit assistant for GitHub repositories that detects static vulnerabilities (leaked credentials, vulnerable dependencies, bad Docker practices, excessive GitHub Actions permissions), calculates a security score, and provides risk explanations and mitigation recommendations via Cohere.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible clients to audit public GitHub repositories and receive structured launch-readiness reports with evidence-backed findings, reproducible scoring, and ready-to-paste launch copy.
      89 npm
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several tools have overlapping or near-duplicate purposes: cloudflare_coverage_ledger_validate vs. audit_coverage_validate, and cloudflare_findings_validate vs. audit_findings_validate. An agent could easily pick the wrong validator or confuse the Cloudflare-specific adapter with the generic audit phase tool, even though descriptions provide some distinction.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most names follow a verb_noun or resource_action pattern, but the set mixes four prefix families: cloudflare_, audit_, repository_, and a standalone source_security_review. The naming is readable but not predictable across the whole server.

    Tool Count4/5

    Fourteen tools is reasonable for a multi-phase security audit workflow spanning reconnaissance, validation, review, verification, and reporting. The count is slightly inflated by parallel Cloudflare-specific and generic audit validators.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the audit lifecycle from repository reconnaissance through findings validation, independent verification, and report generation. Minor gaps exist around remediation or code-diff inspection, but core workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues