matlab-mcp-server-python

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It discloses the action (running 'ver' in MATLAB) and the return output (toolbox configuration info), but lacks details on permissions, rate limits, or error handling. It adds some behavioral context but not comprehensively.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the main purpose in the first sentence, followed by a brief technical detail. Both sentences earn their place by providing essential information without waste, making it highly efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's low complexity (0 parameters), no annotations, and the presence of an output schema, the description is complete enough for a listing tool. It explains what the tool does and what it returns, though it could benefit from more behavioral context like error scenarios.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are 0 parameters, and schema description coverage is 100%, so the description does not need to compensate. The baseline for 0 parameters is 4, as it appropriately avoids unnecessary parameter details and focuses on the tool's purpose.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific action ('List available MATLAB toolboxes') and the resource ('MATLAB toolboxes'), distinguishing it from siblings like list_files or list_functions. It explicitly mentions running 'ver' in MATLAB, which provides technical specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for retrieving toolbox information in MATLAB but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_help or list_functions. No exclusions or prerequisites are mentioned, leaving usage context somewhat open-ended.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.