hakowan-mcp
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to hakowan-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceLanguage-owned MCP gateway and execution-host coordination for Hara, exposing read-only tools for runtime introspection, evaluation, calls, and checks, with an optional deterministic test fixture for development.4Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents and software to create, edit, inspect, validate, and export CAD geometry through MCP using backend-neutral typed operations, with FreeCAD/OpenCascade as the authoritative B-rep backend and JSCAD preview.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides safe, deterministic inspection, transformation, validation, and diffing of structured data (JSON, CSV, YAML, Parquet) via schema-aware MCP tools.4Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents and MCP clients to perform 3D asset creation and verification: exact b-rep CAD, GLB validation with embedded certificates, mesh inspection, and physics scenes, with most tools running without Blender.3681 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides five fail-closed MCP tools for validating reference images and sculpting plans, enabling user-owned procedural Three.js source creation through validated gates and grimoire lookups.5850 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to procedurally generate, transform, inspect, and export 3D meshes and scenes through MCP tools.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
The tools are mostly distinct by resource and action, especially the pipeline stages: validate, compile, observe, render, patch, and evaluate. The only mild ambiguity is among get_schema, get_spec_template, and get_spec, though their descriptions do enough to guide selection.
Every tool follows a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern, such as get_spec, validate_spec, compile_spec, and apply_patch. There are no vague single-word names or mixed conventions.
Thirteen tools is within the ideal scope for a specification-and-rendering server. Each tool maps to a distinct stage in the workflow, from schema exploration and validation to rendering and patch evaluation.
The tool surface covers the full FigureSpec lifecycle: creation from templates, validation, retrieval, compilation, observation, rendering, patching, and visual evaluation. No critical workflow dead ends are evident for the stated domain.