Skip to main content
Glama
HainanZhao

mcp-gitlab-jira

by HainanZhao
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-gitlab-jira

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • qodev-gitlab-mcp

      qodevai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server for GitLab integration, enabling AI assistants to manage projects, merge requests, pipelines, issues, releases, and more.
      MIT

    • Jira MCP Server

      sthirugn
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A clean and focused Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides seamless integration between AI assistants and Jira, enabling natural language interaction with your Jira projects, issues, and workflows.
      5
      MIT

    • GitLab MCP Server

      ZephyrDeng
      -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to interact with GitLab repositories, allowing tasks like managing merge requests, searching projects, and creating comments through RESTful API integration.
      5 npm
      2
      -

    • gitlab-mcp

      mcpland
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server for GitLab enabling AI assistants to read and manage GitLab projects, merge requests, issues, pipelines, wikis, releases, and more through a unified interface.
      100
      403 npm
      10
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 32 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes targeting specific GitLab resources and actions, with clear boundaries like gitlab_create_issue vs. gitlab_update_issue. However, some overlap exists between gitlab_list_project_members and gitlab_list_project_members_by_project_name, which could cause confusion as they serve similar functions with minor differences in input parameters.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent gitlab_verb_noun pattern with snake_case throughout, such as gitlab_get_issue_details and gitlab_trigger_pipeline. This predictability makes it easy for agents to understand and navigate the toolset without naming conflicts or style variations.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 32 tools, the count is borderline high for a GitLab-focused server, as it may feel heavy and potentially overwhelming for agents. While it covers many aspects, it approaches the upper limit where efficiency could be impacted, though it remains within a reasonable scope for comprehensive GitLab operations.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset provides extensive coverage of GitLab's domain, including CRUD operations for issues, merge requests, branches, pipelines, and more, with no obvious gaps. It supports full lifecycle management from creation to updates and deletions, ensuring agents can handle most workflows without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources