Skip to main content
Glama
HLH2023
by HLH2023

Related Servers

Alternatives to terminal-use-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local Python MCP server for driving, perceiving, and rendering terminal programs, using a pluggable PTY and pyte screen model to let AI agents interact with real TUIs.
      14
      325 PyPI
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for SSH and local terminal access. Supports interactive commands, long-running processes, and TUI apps like tmux/zellij
      6
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server enabling AI agents to interact with terminal applications through structured Terminal State Tree representation. Works with any AI assistant that supports the Model Context Protocol.
      41 npm
      19
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing interactive processes, enabling AI agents to start, interact with, and terminate long-running programs like SSH sessions, REPLs, and installers via read/write operations.
      8
      8
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 29 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools are distinct, but several have overlapping functionality: terminal.scroll and terminal.mouse_scroll both control viewport scrolling, terminal.find and terminal.wait_for_text both search screen content, and terminal.type, terminal.paste, terminal.press all send input. This could cause agent confusion.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All tools share the 'terminal.' prefix, but the verb patterns are inconsistent: some are imperative verbs (list, kill, start), while others are noun phrases (keys, targets, provider_capabilities). This mix reduces predictability.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 29 tools, the server offers extensive functionality, but the number is high compared to typical MCP servers. While each tool serves a specific purpose, the surface could be streamlined without losing core capabilities.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers nearly all aspects of terminal interaction: session management, keystrokes, mouse events, text operations, tmux management, and diagnostics. There are no obvious gaps for its intended use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues