The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: create_did_signature focuses solely on signing a message, while generate_auth_payload creates a complete authentication payload including the signature and other fields. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (create_did_signature and generate_auth_payload), using snake_case throughout. The naming is predictable and readable, with no deviations in style.

With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for its apparent authentication/identity domain. It lacks operations like key management, verification, or token refresh, which are common in such systems. The count is too low for comprehensive coverage.

The tool set is severely incomplete for an authentication server. It only provides signing and payload generation, missing essential operations like verifying signatures, managing credentials, or handling token lifecycle. This will likely cause agent failures in broader authentication workflows.