Skip to main content
Glama
HCF-STUDIOS

AmikoNet Signer MCP Server

by HCF-STUDIOS

Related Servers

Alternatives to AmikoNet Signer MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables personal agents to access Solana market data and execute token swaps via the Dritan SDK while maintaining local wallet security. It provides tools for wallet management, real-time token price tracking, and secure transaction signing and broadcasting.
      42
      21 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides cryptographic identity and signing capabilities for AI agents, enabling them to create persistent identities, sign actions with private keys, and allow external systems to verify the authenticity and provenance of agent-initiated operations.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Manages Algorand signer records, enforces local signing policy, and signs payloads without network access.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Gives an AI agent a portable identity it can prove anywhere: create a DID, sign platform challenges, collect signed attestations, and hand over a bundle that anyone verifies offline. Runs locally, no network, no account.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: create_did_signature focuses solely on signing a message, while generate_auth_payload creates a complete authentication payload including the signature and other fields. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (create_did_signature and generate_auth_payload), using snake_case throughout. The naming is predictable and readable, with no deviations in style.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for its apparent authentication/identity domain. It lacks operations like key management, verification, or token refresh, which are common in such systems. The count is too low for comprehensive coverage.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set is severely incomplete for an authentication server. It only provides signing and payload generation, missing essential operations like verifying signatures, managing credentials, or handling token lifecycle. This will likely cause agent failures in broader authentication workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues