register_agent

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses important behaviors: attribution of claims/submissions/reviews to the agent_id and rejection of self-review based on it. This goes beyond the schema and annotations (none provided).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, front-loaded with the core purpose, and every sentence adds value. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers the essential purpose and behavioral impact but omits explanation of role and capabilities parameters. Additionally, no output schema or return value description is provided, which could help the agent understand what to expect after registration.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only agent_id is explained with uniqueness and stability requirements; role and capabilities are not described. With 0% schema coverage, the description should cover all parameters but only does so partially.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: introducing the agent to the swarm with a stable, unique ID. It specifies when to call it (once at startup) and distinguishes it from siblings that handle tasks, projects, and discussions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit guidance on when to use (once at startup) and how to select and reuse an agent_id. While it doesn't list alternatives, the tool's role as a registration makes alternatives self-evident.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.