Skip to main content
Glama
H2SO4620

ForgeSwarm

by H2SO4620
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to ForgeSwarm

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Axis

      VirSanghavi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for coordinating multiple AI agents across developers and vendors with a shared job board, per-file locking, and live project context.
      5
      AGPL 3.0

    • agentloop

      luckeyfaraday
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI agents to run a deterministic orchestration loop with decomposition, subagent execution, and review feedback across multiple LLM backends.
      60
      MIT

    • agent-comm

      keshrath
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI coding agents to communicate, share state, and coordinate work in real time via MCP tools or REST API.
      44 npm
      8
      MIT

    • lxDIG MCP

      lexCoder2
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives AI coding assistants persistent memory, structural code graph analysis, and safe multi-agent coordination, enabling them to answer architectural questions, track decisions across sessions, and coordinate safely in multi-agent workflows.
      39
      4
      -
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    All 24 tools have clearly distinct purposes, from task lifecycle (claim, update, complete, submit) to project management (create, plan) and collaboration (discussions, reviews, context). No two tools overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., claim_task, submit_plan, list_projects). The naming conventions are uniform and predictable across the entire set.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 24 tools, the count is slightly above the typical well-scoped range (3-15) but remains reasonable given the complexity of swarm orchestration. None feel redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the full lifecycle of project creation, task management, review, discussions, decisions, and context sharing. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no project editing or task deletion), but core workflows are supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources