Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ocr-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server that exposes the scan_text and scan_paths tools so AI coding agents can scan text, files, staged Git changes, local history and archives for secrets entirely offline, returning redacted findings with rules, positions and fingerprints and flagging incomplete scans. Results can be emitted as JSON, JSONL or SARIF without ever serializing raw secret values or source snippets.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Cursor, Claude Desktop, and Claude Code to run deterministic static-analysis tools for scanning projects, listing entry points and reachable sinks, tracing taint paths, explaining findings, and checking sanitizers without API keys or network access.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to run deterministic, read-only local repository audits for risky GitHub workflows, undocumented environment variables, possible credentials, and conflicting dependency configuration, returning structured findings without sending source code to a service.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    All three tools have clearly distinct purposes: one scans an entire repository, one scans only changed lines, and one reports tooling status. The descriptions explicitly clarify when to prefer scan_diff over scan, eliminating meaningful ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows the same snake_case `semgrep_*` prefix pattern, making the family instantly recognizable. The verb-like suffixes `_scan`, `_scan_diff`, and `_status` are consistent and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is well-scoped for a focused analysis server: two scanning modes plus a status endpoint cover the core workflow without redundancy. Each tool earns its place; adding more would likely dilute the server's purpose.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers full-repo scanning, PR/diff scanning, and availability reporting, with no obvious dead ends. The status tool fills the operational gap for diagnosing unavailable scans, making the workflow self-contained.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues