Skip to main content
Glama
Guitarmaniac24

GetABrain🧠 | Live Human-in-the-Loop MCP for AI Agents

Related Servers

Alternatives to GetABrain🧠 | Live Human-in-the-Loop MCP for AI Agents

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to recruit real humans for evaluation tasks like surveys, A/B tests, and ratings on text, images, audio, and video, returning aggregated results directly into the conversation.
      13
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to hire real human operators for tasks requiring physical presence, human perception, or judgment, such as verification, testing, data collection, and physical-world tasks.
      4
      67 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to hire verified human operators for tasks requiring physical presence, human perception, or judgment, such as real-world verification, product testing, and data collection.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to route tasks requiring human judgment (e.g., content moderation, refund decisions, data verification) to a vetted worker pool, with verified results returned via Lightning Network payments.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Human-as-a-Service for AI agents. When your agent is blocked by a task that requires a real human — accepting ToS, creating accounts, submitting forms, identity verification — it calls NeedHuman. A human completes the task and returns the result with proof.
      3
      45 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: topup link generation, balance checking, response retrieval (one-shot vs. waiting), query listing, response rating, and query submission. The descriptions explicitly differentiate overlapping tools like get_responses and wait_for_responses.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_topup_link, get_balance, list_queries). The verbs are descriptive and the naming convention is uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 7 tools, the server covers the essential operations for a human-in-the-loop system: balance management, query lifecycle (submit, wait, check), listing, and rating. The count feels well-scoped without unnecessary bloat or gaps.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core workflow (submit, wait, get, rate, fund). However, there are minor gaps: no tool to cancel or delete a query, and no ability to manage balance history or refunds. These are not critical but slightly reduce completeness.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive