get_newest_tokens

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds only scoping info, disclosing nothing about pagination behavior, result ordering, result limits, or what 'newest' is measured against. It largely restates the name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It is tight, though the brevity comes partly from under-specification rather than disciplined concision.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema and no annotations covering result shape, so the description should explain the return set and pagination but does not. For a discovery/list tool with three undocumented query parameters, this leaves the agent guessing at invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Three parameters (page, chain, limit) with 0% schema description coverage, so the description must carry the burden and does not. It never explains what 'page' does, the default/max for 'limit', or whether 'chain' is a name, id, or either despite the string|number type union.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb (get) and resource (newest tokens) and states the scope (all chains, or one chain). 'Newest' gives it a distinct identity versus siblings like get_trending_tokens and get_top_tokens. However it never names or contrasts those siblings explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance and no alternatives mentioned, despite many overlapping token-discovery siblings (get_top_tokens, get_trending_tokens, get_bigbuys, get_xstocks). The parenthetical about a specific chain is the only hint about invocation context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.