get_newest_tokens

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden, and it discloses almost nothing: no pagination behavior despite a 'page' parameter, no default ordering, no rate limits, and no indication of what a 'newest' token record contains. Only the chain-scoping behavior is hinted at.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short sentence, front-loaded with the verb and resource, with zero filler. It is efficient, though its brevity comes at the cost of the information other dimensions need.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a three-parameter tool with no annotations, no output schema, and zero schema descriptions, the description is too thin. An agent knows roughly what it returns but not how to page, how to format chain, or how results are ordered.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% for all three parameters. The description only indirectly gestures at 'chain' via 'or a specific chain'; it says nothing about 'page' or 'limit', including defaults, ranges, or whether chain accepts a name or numeric ID despite the schema allowing both types.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Get newest tokens') plus scope ('across all chains (or a specific chain)'), so the core action is unambiguous. However, it does nothing to distinguish itself from closely related siblings like get_trending_tokens and get_top_tokens, which an agent would need in order to pick correctly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance. With siblings such as get_trending_tokens and get_top_tokens in the same list, the description never explains how 'newest' differs from 'trending' or 'top', leaving the selection to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.