duplicacy-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to duplicacy-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for managing Duplicati backups from an LLM.17MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for administering Duplicacy backups via the duplicacy-web API, enabling AI clients to inspect and manage storages, repositories, schedules, and jobs.15MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA lean MCP server that provides LLM agents with transparent access to multiple Prometheus instances for metrics analysis and SRE operations.4GPL 2.0

prometheus-mcp-serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that lets LLMs interact with a running Prometheus instance via its API, enabling metric analysis, PromQL queries, and rule/target inspection. It also provides embedded documentation and guided runbooks for common Prometheus tasks.132Apache 2.0- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables Large Language Models to retrieve, analyze, and query metric data from Prometheus databases through pre-defined routes.33MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI assistants to query and analyze Prometheus metrics through PromQL, with support for metric discovery and authentication.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
The tools mostly have clearly distinct monitoring purposes: overview is an aggregate health check, status is one snapshot, and history is the last completed run. The main ambiguity is between get_backup_status and get_backup_history, since both return last-run details, but the descriptions explicitly distinguish current state versus completed-run history.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: get_backup_history, get_backup_overview, get_backup_status, get_prune_status, get_storage_usage, and list_snapshots. The use of list_snapshots instead of get_snapshots is still a conventional verb_noun choice and does not break readability.
Six tools is well-scoped for a read-only Duplicacy backup monitoring server. Each tool maps to a distinct monitoring concern: discovery, per-snapshot status/history, aggregate health, prune status, and storage usage.
The surface covers the core monitoring workflows: discovering snapshots, checking backup health, inspecting a snapshot, reviewing last-run history, prune status, and storage usage. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit standalone tool for listing storage targets or machines, but list_snapshots exposes those values and agents can work around this.