Skip to main content
Glama
Gecka-Apps

leginova-mcp

by Gecka-Apps
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to leginova-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • French Law MCP Server

      jmtanguy
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides access to official French legal databases (Légifrance and JudiLibre) to search and retrieve French legislation, legal codes, case law, and judicial decisions through authenticated APIs.
      33
      MIT

    • data-newcaledonia

      pipeworx-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables searching, querying, and retrieving metadata for datasets from New Caledonia Open Data (data.gouv.nc) using ODSQL.
      141 npm
      MIT

    • mcp-new-caledonia

      lacausecrypto
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables querying New Caledonia public open datasets from data.gouv.nc across 10 domains and 29 tools, including holidays, companies, employment, weather, mining, environment, population, tourism, and transport, via stdio for MCP clients.
      29
      29 npm
      2
      MIT

    • JusticeLibre

      Dahliyaal
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables legal research by providing unified search across ~3.3 million court decisions (French and European) and ~1.5 million consolidated law articles, with tools for retrieving full texts and historical versions, all without authentication.
      10
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools target distinct resources and workflows, but there is some overlap between leginova_search, leginova_advanced_search, and leginova_suggest, and between the code retrieval tools. Descriptions clarify intended use, so misselection is possible but manageable.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all tools use a consistent leginova_ prefix with snake_case naming. Minor deviations include mixed retrieval verbs (get vs read) and the adjective-first leginova_advanced_search, but the pattern remains readable and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 14 tools, the server is well-scoped for legal research across codes, texts, JONC, jurisprudence, and debates. Each tool appears to cover a distinct retrieval or navigation need.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers search, advanced search, autocomplete, code browsing, article and section reading, consolidated texts, jurisprudence, JONC issues and items, debates, chronological browsing, and catalogue identifiers. This provides complete lifecycle coverage for the legal research domain without obvious dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources