origin_set_cell_value

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description carries full burden. It fails to disclose critical behaviors such as whether existing cell content is overwritten, data type constraints, error handling, or side effects. The description is too minimal for safe agent invocation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no unnecessary words. However, it may be too concise, missing important details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 5 parameters (3 required) and no annotations. The description only covers the indexing method and the main action. It omits the return value (though output schema exists), the role of optional parameters, and does not provide enough information for an agent to use the tool correctly in varied contexts.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description clarifies the zero-based row indexing and the column (name or index). However, it does not explain the `value` parameter type or the optional `book_name` and `sheet_name`, leaving significant gaps.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (set), the target (worksheet cell value), and the method (by zero-based row and column name/index). This distinguishes from sibling tools like origin_get_cell_value or origin_write_worksheet.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like origin_write_worksheet or origin_get_cell_value is provided. The description implies usage for a single cell but does not explicitly state exclusions or context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.