origin_plot_3d_bars

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose side effects (e.g., does it create a new graph or modify an existing one?), required permissions, or resource destruction. The description carries the full burden but fails to provide behavioral details beyond the basic action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it lacks necessary detail. While it is front-loaded, it is too brief to be effective. Every word earns its place, but the content is insufficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 5 parameters with zero schema description, no annotations, and a large set of sibling tools, the description is severely incomplete. It does not explain return values (output schema exists but ignored), parameter purpose, or how this tool fits among similar plotting tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description adds no information about the 5 parameters (path, selected_cols, graph_name, title, export_path). The description only says 'from table data', which does not explain parameter meanings or usage. This leaves agents with no guidance on how to populate parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create') and the resource ('3D bar plot from table data'). However, among many similar 3D plot siblings, it does not differentiate itself (e.g., from origin_plot_3d_scatter or origin_plot_3d_surface). The phrase 'from table data' implies a source but is vague.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus the many alternative 3D plot tools (e.g., scatter, surface). No exclusions or prerequisites are mentioned. The purpose is implied by the name, but the description offers no explicit usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.