disclos-eu-ai-act
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| classify_ai_systemA | Classify an AI system or product under the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) and return its risk tier, obligations and deadlines. Map the user's description to the boolean flags below. When unsure, ask the user or choose the more cautious answer. Returns a structured 'scope finding'. |
| eu_ai_act_timelineA | Return the EU AI Act enforcement timeline — the key dates and what takes effect on each. |
| explain_tierA | Explain a single EU AI Act risk tier in detail: what it means, the obligations, and the deadline. |
| framework_crosswalkA | Map an EU AI Act risk tier to the equivalent controls in adjacent governance frameworks — ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, and GDPR. Use when the user asks how the EU AI Act lines up with ISO 42001, NIST, GDPR, or their existing compliance program. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
The tools are mostly distinct: classify_ai_system maps user input to a risk tier, explain_tier describes a known tier, while timeline and crosswalk serve clear reference purposes. There is slight overlap between classify_ai_system and explain_tier (both return obligations and deadlines), but their primary functions differ enough to avoid confusion.
All names use snake_case, but the pattern is mixed: classify_ai_system and explain_tier are verb_noun, while eu_ai_act_timeline and framework_crosswalk are noun phrases. The inconsistency in starting part (verb vs. noun) makes the set slightly less predictable.
Four tools is well-scoped for an information-focused EU AI Act server. Each tool covers a specific high-level user need without redundancy, and the count is neither too thin nor excessive.
The set covers classification, timeline, tier explanations, and cross-framework mapping, which addresses common compliance questions. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool for searching specific legal provisions or compliance checklists), but the core workflows are covered and agents can work around these gaps.