Skip to main content
Glama
GatisOzols

disclos-eu-ai-act

by GatisOzols
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to disclos-eu-ai-act

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ai-act-mcp

      a2welt
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables EU AI Act compliance assessment by classifying AI systems, listing obligations, computing deadlines, and scanning repos for required documentation, all running locally.
      4
      2
      MIT

    • conformite-ia-mcp

      AgentIA1984-cmd
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides an AI agent with regulatory compliance tools for the French/European market based on the AI Act and GDPR, including system classification, obligation listing, deadline schedules, legal reference lookup, and GDPR crosschecks.
      -

    • EU AI Act Compliance MCP

      SonnyLabs
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides automated EU AI Act compliance tools, including risk classification, role determination, transparency disclosures, content watermarking, deepfake labeling, and security threat detection.
      16
      33
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools are mostly distinct: classify_ai_system maps user input to a risk tier, explain_tier describes a known tier, while timeline and crosswalk serve clear reference purposes. There is slight overlap between classify_ai_system and explain_tier (both return obligations and deadlines), but their primary functions differ enough to avoid confusion.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use snake_case, but the pattern is mixed: classify_ai_system and explain_tier are verb_noun, while eu_ai_act_timeline and framework_crosswalk are noun phrases. The inconsistency in starting part (verb vs. noun) makes the set slightly less predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for an information-focused EU AI Act server. Each tool covers a specific high-level user need without redundancy, and the count is neither too thin nor excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers classification, timeline, tier explanations, and cross-framework mapping, which addresses common compliance questions. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool for searching specific legal provisions or compliance checklists), but the core workflows are covered and agents can work around these gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources