Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to browser-atlas

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      He gives AI agents a browser with memory: they explore a website once, then replay the learned route in a single tool call with zero model calls, repairing individual steps when the site changes. It also keeps a per-site map of seen pages and controls, handles manual sign-in and multiple signed-in profiles, and lets agents on one machine share routes.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Gives agents an autonomous browser that takes a single goal-level call and drives a real Chrome step by step, returning a verified result or a concrete question instead of guessing. It keeps passwords out of prompts, requires approval before buy/pay/delete actions, and detects login walls and bot challenges.
      9
      17 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to drive a real browser like a person — crawling every page and role, running real user journeys, and auditing controls a DOM-based test misses — so UI, accessibility and permission bugs are found and only the screens affected by recent changes are re-tested. Runs are script-driven and read-only by default, so testing costs no model tokens and nothing about the app is sent to an AI.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to navigate and operate websites through MCP tools compiled from source-defined routes, with governance controls such as permissions and rate limits.
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to browse and interact with web pages through compact, typed structural representations — landmarks, headings, interactive elements, and forms — served in three controllable detail levels instead of full accessibility-tree dumps. Agents can navigate, query for specific elements, fill forms, manage tabs and cookies, capture screenshots, and run audits while paying a fraction of the token cost.
      4 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides browser automation tools for coding agents—goto, browse, goal, page_state, and summary—so agents can drive real pages through auditable, gated decisions and record traces for offline replay.
      33
      74 PyPI
      2
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 29 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are grouped by clear namespaces and each has a distinct job: navigation (open/goto/back), interaction (click/type/wait/dismiss), inspection (read/screenshot/tabs), memory (recall/record/rate/stats), atlas lookup (find/site/guard) and sharing (preview/upload/sync). The closest pairs — browser_open vs browser_goto (new tab vs same episode), browser_close vs browser_close_mine, memory_record vs memory_rate, lesson_record vs map_learned — are each differentiated in their descriptions, though memory/lesson/atlas tools still require careful reading to keep apart.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The dominant pattern is namespace-prefixed snake_case (browser_*, memory_*, atlas_*, share_*) with verb-last or verb-first sub-names, which is predictable and readable. Only a few strays break the pattern: lesson_record and map_learned are noun_verb while their peers are verb_noun, and login_sites is noun_noun with no namespace, so the shape is mostly but not fully uniform.

    Tool Count3/5

    29 tools is on the heavy side for one server, and a few are mergeable: atlas_site is largely a detail view of atlas_find results, browser_close and browser_close_mine could be one tool with a scope argument, and memory_stats is a thin reporting wrapper. The breadth (browser control plus memory plus atlas plus sharing) does justify many tools, so it is heavy rather than bloated, but it sits just past the comfortable range.

    Completeness4/5

    The browser lifecycle is well covered end to end: launch, tabs, open/goto/back, read with outlines and offsets, click, type, wait, dismiss, batched run, screenshot, close with verdict, plus login and remembered credentials. Remaining gaps are minor but real — no scroll or raw key-press tool, no file upload or download handling, and no explicit select/option control — all of which an agent would have to improvise around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues