Skip to main content
Glama
Frumane
by Frumane

Related Servers

Alternatives to gecko-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable CLIs to operate real, already-logged-in Firefox tabs via a WebExtension and native messaging, without simulated input. Supports navigation, clicking, typing, reading, screenshots, and console/network capture with policy gating and frame awareness.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local-first browser automation for LibreWolf, enabling controlled profile browsing with status, navigation, screenshots, console/network inspection, and more through MCP.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives local clients controlled access to a Firefox profile, enabling tab listing, reading, interaction, scripting, and screenshots with granular, revocable permissions.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that drives your real Chrome/Edge/Opera browser through a Chrome extension and DevTools Protocol, preserving logins and session state, and can also perform OS-level mouse and keyboard input behind approval.
      55
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Lets MCP clients control a live Zen/Firefox browser to navigate, click, fill forms, screenshot, and execute JavaScript through a persistent server and browser extension.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local Firefox bridge for MCP agents that enables tab control, DOM interaction, mouse/keyboard actions, and screenshots.
      24
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 41 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but there is potential confusion between synthetic (click, type_text) and real OS (real_click, real_type) variants, and between snapshot/find/read_page for content extraction. Overall, descriptions help disambiguate.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., open_tab, get_article, enable_evaluate, real_click). No mixed conventions or chaotic naming.

    Tool Count3/5

    41 tools is high for a browser automation server, which typically has 10-20. While many actions are covered, some tools like separate real/synthetic variants and enable/disable toggles bloat the count.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers core browser automation well: navigation, tabs, element interaction, content extraction, OS input, screenshots, workspaces. Missing download handling and drag-and-drop, but not severely incomplete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues