paygentic

paygentic_signup

Instructions

Create a new PayGent account, wallet, and API key. Use this first if you don't have an account yet. No API key required.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "email": "<email>",
      "password": "<password>"
    },
    "name": "paygentic_signup"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description
`email`	Yes	Your email address for the account
`password`	Yes	Password (8+ characters)
`agentName`	No	A name for your agent (e.g. 'support-bot')
`agentType`	No
`description`	No
`capabilities`	No
`modelProvider`	No	AI model provider (e.g. 'openai', 'anthropic')

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

First observedv1.0.0Jun 25, 2026

TDQS

A3.5/5.0

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only discloses that it creates resources and requires no API key. It omits details on error handling, idempotency, side effects, or success response.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise, consisting of two sentences that front-load the purpose with no unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite good purpose and usage guidance, the description lacks depth on return values (no output schema), parameter details, and potential side effects of creating an account, wallet, and API key.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 57% (moderate), but the description adds no parameter information beyond what the schema provides, failing to compensate for the uncovered parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Create' and specifies the resources 'PayGent account, wallet, and API key', distinguishing it from sibling tools that perform other operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly says 'Use this first if you don't have an account yet' and 'No API key required', providing clear when-to-use and prerequisite context, though lacks explicit when-not-to-use or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server