paygentic_get_dashboard

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only mentions API key requirement. Does not disclose whether data is real-time or cached, rate limits, or consequences of invalid credentials. For a read operation, destructive behavior is not an issue, but other aspects are omitted.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no wasted words. First sentence lists contents, second sentence adds requirement. Front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with no parameters and no output schema, description lists key return items and a requirement. However, lacks details on response structure and differentiation from siblings, leaving some gaps for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist, and schema coverage is 100%. Baseline score of 4 applies. Description adds no parameter information but does list return fields, which is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb 'Get', resource 'dashboard overview', and lists specific items (total balance, spend, active wallets, recent activity). This distinguishes it from sibling tools that focus on individual resources like balance or transactions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Only mentions 'Requires API key' as a prerequisite. No guidance on when to use this dashboard vs checking specific balances (paygentic_check_balance) or transaction lists (paygentic_get_transactions). Missing context for tool selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.