Get Link Analytics

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=true and the description aligns with 'Retrieve'. It discloses the nature of the returned data (aggregated, breakdowns) and time period context, adding value beyond the annotation. No contradictions or missing behavioral caveats are evident.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, well-structured sentence that front-loads the action and resource, then details the output. Every phrase is informative and there is no redundancy or fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description sufficiently enumerates return categories (total clicks, unique clicks, breakdowns) so an agent knows what to expect. The tool is simple with only two parameters, and annotations provide the safety profile. This is complete for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema covers both parameters with full descriptions (linkId, period), including an enum for period. The description adds minimal context by referencing 'requested time period', which maps to period, but does not enrich beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline 3 applies because schema coverage is 100%.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Retrieve' and the resource 'click analytics for a specific link', and enumerates specific data fields (total clicks, unique clicks, breakdowns by platform, country, referrer). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_link, which would return link configuration rather than analytics.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear context: analytics for a single link over a specified time period. However, it does not explicitly mention when not to use this tool or provide alternatives. Since no other analytics tool exists among siblings, the context is clear but lacks explicit exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.