Skip to main content
Glama
FlywheelStudio

ULink MCP Server

by FlywheelStudio
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to ULink MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • DWZ Short URL MCP Server

      muleiwu
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to create, manage, and analyze short URLs through complete URL shortening functionality. Supports batch operations, custom domains, click statistics, and comprehensive link management.
      6
      6 npm
      1
      MIT
    • LinkForty MCP Server by LinkForty

      LinkForty MCP Serverofficial

      LinkForty
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants like Claude and Cursor to LinkForty deep links and analytics, enabling natural language management of links, analytics, templates, projects, and SDK integration.
      20
      11 npm
      MIT
    • esyURL MCP server by esyurl

      esyURL MCP serverofficial

      esyurl
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create, update, organize, and delete short links; render styled QR codes; route visitors by device or country; and read click and scan statistics. Agents can also manage groups and custom domains while changing destinations without breaking printed QR codes or shared short URLs.
      MIT

    • linkbit-mcp

      elkinegor
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to shorten links, bulk create URLs, generate QR codes, manage and disable links, and retrieve click analytics from MCP clients like Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and n8n.
      9
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action (e.g., create_project vs configure_project vs update_project are clearly separated by their descriptions). There is no meaningful overlap between link, domain, API key, subscription, or auth tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the same lowercase snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_projects, create_link, verify_domain, etc.). 'authenticate' is a single verb but fits the pattern as a standalone action.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 24 tools, the server falls into the 'heavy' range (16-25). While the breadth of features (projects, links, domains, API keys, billing, analytics) justifies many tools, it still feels a bit much for an MCP server and could be trimmed.

    Completeness3/5

    There is a notable gap: no delete_project tool, despite having create/update/get/list for projects. This creates a dead end for project lifecycle management. Other domains (links, domains, API keys) have full CRUD or equivalent coverage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources