A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceProvides location-based services and geospatial data from OpenStreetMap, enabling geocoding, route directions, nearby place search, and neighborhood analysis through natural language.
12
MIT
FilmMap MCP server
by Flightmussy
Related Servers
Alternatives to FilmMap MCP server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnhances LLM capabilities with location-based services and geospatial data, enabling users to geocode addresses, find nearby points of interest, get directions, optimize meeting points, and analyze neighborhoods.12226MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceLets LLMs rank, compare, and connect actors and movies from local IMDb non-commercial datasets stored in DuckDB, with Wikidata enrichment.6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables users to search movies and actor profiles, discover soundtracks, and generate curated Spotify playlists, with full playback control and playlist management through natural language.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables screenwriters to search for similar scenes, fetch scene details, list indexed movies, find mood reference scenes, and get analysis style guidance, all grounded in real produced scripts.5MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables movie and TV recommendation workflows, including title resolution, evidence tracking, candidate retrieval from MovieLens and TMDB, and recording of recommendation runs and reactions.8MIT
TDQS
A4.1/5.0
Scored across 8 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool answers a clearly distinct question: title-to-places, place-to-titles, name search, ranked lists, statistics, and proximity. Even the two question-shaped tools are unambiguous because one takes a production and the other takes a place.
Naming Consistency3/5
Naming mixes verb-led tools like search_productions and list_countries with question-style names like where_was_it_filmed and noun phrases like top_locations and locations_near. All names are readable and lowercased, but there is no single consistent convention across the set.
Tool Count5/5
Eight tools is well within the ideal range for a read-only atlas, and each tool covers a distinct workflow: lookup, search, ranking, statistics, and spatial queries. None feels redundant or extraneous.
Completeness5/5
The surface covers the core bidirectional lookup (production-to-locations and location-to-productions), title disambiguation, location search, country/global rankings, statistics, and nearby searches. For a read-only Wikidata-backed atlas there are no obvious dead ends or missing core operations.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues