Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
meraki-dashboard-api

meraki-dashboard-api

by Flagler-County-BoCC
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

wireless-list-status

List the current status of each SSID on a Meraki access point to view wireless network availability.

Instructions

Return the SSID statuses of an access point. (read-only)

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "serial": "<serial>"
    },
    "name": "wireless-list-status"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
serialYesSerial
fieldsNoReturn only these top-level fields; omit for all. Available: basicServiceSets.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description only mentions 'read-only', which is helpful but insufficient; it lacks disclosure of error handling, authorization needs, or performance traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, front-loaded with the core purpose, and contains no unnecessary text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only status tool with 2 parameters and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate but could be improved by noting the return format or error conditions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3; the description adds no meaning beyond the schema, e.g., it does not explain the 'fields' parameter options or the meaning of 'basicServiceSets'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Return') and the resource ('SSID statuses of an access point'), and distinguishes from sibling tools like wireless-list-ssids by focusing on statuses.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any exclusions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools