networks-list-overview

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full behavioral disclosure. It states 'read-only', indicating non-destructive behavior, but lacks details on rate limits, data freshness, aggregation methods, or response size. The description is adequate but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence plus a parenthetical, making it very concise. It front-loads the key action and resource. However, it could include a bit more context without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 6 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is insufficient. It does not explain what the overview statistics contain (e.g., counts, usage), how to interpret results, or any limitations like maximum time range. The tool's complexity demands more contextual detail.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds that the tool returns 'overview statistics for network clients', but does not clarify how parameters like 'fields' or 'resolution' affect the output beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description specifies the action 'Return' and the resource 'overview statistics for network clients', which is a specific verb-noun pair. The '(read-only)' annotation further clarifies the tool's nature. Among siblings like 'networks-list-clients' (which likely returns detailed client data), this tool is clearly for aggregated overview statistics.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for obtaining overview statistics, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'networks-list-clients' or 'get-organization-clients-overview'. No exclusions or prerequisites are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.