Skip to main content
Glama
FelipeRego

dbtBigQuery

by FelipeRego

Related Servers

Alternatives to dbtBigQuery

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLM applications to query Google Analytics 4 data through standard MCP interfaces, supporting real-time data, custom reports, and metadata discovery.
      5
      25 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLM applications to query and analyze Google Analytics 4 data through standard MCP interfaces, supporting service account and OAuth2 authentication.
      5
      9 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables querying Google Analytics 4 data using natural language through MCP clients like Claude and Cursor, supporting 200+ dimensions and metrics for traffic, user behavior, and e-commerce analysis.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables conversational analysis of Google Analytics 4 data through MCP-compatible clients like Claude and ChatGPT, providing conversion diagnostics and insights.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to answer analytics questions with provable correctness by resolving metrics through the semantic layer, tracing lineage, traversing knowledge graphs, checking freshness, and searching glossary definitions, while enforcing access controls and logging every call.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables querying Google Analytics 4 properties using natural language through MCP clients. Supports customizable reports with any dimensions and metrics, listing properties, and real-time data.
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct concern: listing metrics, listing semantic models, describing a single metric, listing valid dimensions, running queries, explaining SQL, and checking health. There is no overlap or ambiguity—an agent can clearly choose the right tool for the task.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_*, describe_metric, query_metrics, explain_metric_sql, health_check). No mixed conventions or vague verbs; the naming is predictable and self-documenting.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for a semantic layer server. Each tool covers a necessary aspect of exploring, querying, and validating metrics without redundancy or bloat. The count feels right for the domain.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the full read-only lifecycle of the semantic layer: discovery (list_metrics, list_semantic_models), definition (describe_metric), grouping validation (list_dimensions), execution (query_metrics), cost/explanation (explain_metric_sql), and environment readiness (health_check). No obvious gaps for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues