io.github.mischuh/canonic
Connects to local DuckDB .duckdb files as well as CSV and Parquet files, enabling the server to query and build context from these data sources.
Integrates with Keycloak as an OAuth 2.1 identity provider for remote/enterprise deployments, enabling role and tenant enforcement, masking, and run_sql gating for differently-scoped users.
Connects to local SQLite .db files as a data source, allowing the server to query and generate semantics from the database schema.
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@io.github.mischuh/canonicWhat was last month's revenue using the canonical definition?"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
canonic
The context layer that lets AI agents query your data correctly.
Point canonic at your database and it builds the context an agent needs to answer data questions accurately: definitions, relationships, business meaning, and the guardrails that stop confidently-wrong answers. It keeps that context up to date as your data changes, and it never touches your warehouse beyond reading it.
๐ Full documentation: https://docs.getcanonic.app
The problem
An AI agent connected straight to your warehouse sees tables and columns, not meaning. It doesn't know that revenue lives in orders.amount but excludes refunds, or that "active customer" has a specific definition your finance team agreed on. So it guesses. Schema access makes an agent fluent. It doesn't make it correct.
Real output, captured from a live run against the ecommerce example:
$ canonic sql "SELECT SUM(amount) FROM fct_orders"
โโโโโโโโโโโ
โ sum โ
โกโโโโโโโโโโฉ
โ 4050.50 โ
โโโโโโโโโโโThis total includes two refunded orders ($260), a confident, well-formatted number that's off by 6.4%.
$ canonic --json query --metrics revenue
{
"result": { "rows": [["3790.50"]] },
"compiled": {
"sql": "SELECT SUM(\"orders\".\"amount\") AS \"revenue\" FROM \"fct_orders\" AS \"orders\" WHERE \"orders\".\"status\" <> 'refunded'"
},
"metadata": {
"guardrails_fired": [{ "id": "revenue-excludes-refunds", "kind": "mandatory_filter" }]
}
}canonic resolves "revenue" to its canonical definition, compiles the guardrail into the SQL whether or not anyone asked for it, and returns the right number with the reasoning attached.
canonic is not a BI tool and not a chat interface: it's the layer that feeds the tools you already have (a BI dashboard, an agent, a notebook) correct, governed answers.
Related MCP server: autokg
What canonic does
Canonical definitions, enforced. An agent asks for a metric by name. canonic resolves it to the one agreed definition and compiles the SQL. Guardrails such as
mandatory_filter,required_dimension,restrict_sourceandmin_trustare part of the contract, so a documented caveat can't be silently skipped. Contracts and guardrailsThe right aggregation, not just valid SQL. Semi-additive measures (MRR snapshots), ratios recomputed at the requested grain, distinct counts, percentiles and running totals each get their own compilation strategy, and joins that would fan out a fact table are caught. Several valid join paths? You pick one with
via, canonic doesn't guess. CompilerAnswers carry their trust. Every result ships a metadata band: the resolved definition, guardrails fired, freshness, final vs. provisional rows, and a trust tier (
trusted,provisional,caution) with the reasons behind it. Assertions gate CI, and confirmed-wrong outcomes lower a metric's trust. Trust and assertionsWhy did it change?
canonic decomposeand the MCP tooldecompose_changeattribute the change of a metric between two periods, overall and by member. The method follows the metric's kind, so a ratio is split into mix and rate effects that add up, instead of per-member differences that do not. Tools referenceRefuse and ask. Ambiguous or unsafe questions come back as a structured reason (
ambiguous_join_path,guardrail_block, ...) the agent can act on, never as a guess. Error codesThe context builds itself. Ingest drafts semantics from your live schema, a dbt manifest or an Apache Ossie model, and learns from Looker and Metabase usage, Notion pages and web docs. Every change is a reviewable diff (
canonic review,canonic apply), drift is flagged, and references to things that disappeared are proposed for removal. IngestionBusiness knowledge for agents. Definitions, policies and caveats live as Markdown pages. Agents search them, read them with live-rendered definitions, and get the relevant caveats attached to an answer. Knowledge layer
Governance built in. Tenant scoping, role-based access, column masking, and OAuth 2.1 / OIDC for the MCP server, including identity assertion for agents acting on behalf of a user. Tenancy and access control
Your warehouse, read-only. Postgres, Redshift, MySQL, Snowflake, Databricks, ClickHouse, SQLite and DuckDB (including CSV and Parquet files). Connectors
Measurable. A local event log feeds
canonic auditandcanonic status, and an accuracy harness (canonic assert,canonic eval baseline) turns "trustworthy" into something you can check. Instrumentation
How it works
your sources canonic consumers
โโโโโโโโโโโโ โโโโโโโ โโโโโโโโโ
warehouse schema โ ingest โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ CLI (query, sql, review)
dbt / Ossie โโโโโโโโโโโถ โ semantics/ knowledge/ โ โโโถ MCP server
Looker, Metabase โ propose โ contracts/ (files in git)โ Claude Code, Cursor, Codex,
Notion, web docs โ โ review โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ any MCP clientA question takes one deterministic path: resolve the metric, compile SQL against the canonical definition, apply guardrails, run it read-only, attach the metadata band. No LLM is involved at answer time.
What an agent gets back
Real output (abridged) from canonic --json query --metrics gross_revenue in the saas-analytics example:
{
"result": { "columns": [{ "name": "gross_revenue", "type": "decimal" }], "rows": [["77071.00"]] },
"compiled": {
"sql": "SELECT SUM(\"fct_invoices\".\"amount\") AS \"gross_revenue\" FROM \"fct_invoices\" AS \"fct_invoices\" WHERE \"fct_invoices\".\"status\" <> 'refunded' AND \"fct_invoices\".\"is_trial\" = FALSE",
"dialect": "duckdb"
},
"metadata": {
"resolved": { "metrics": { "gross_revenue": "fct_invoices.total_amount" } },
"guardrails_fired": [
{ "id": "revenue-excludes-refunds", "kind": "mandatory_filter", "severity": "error" },
{ "id": "revenue-excludes-trials", "kind": "mandatory_filter", "severity": "error" }
],
"freshness": [{ "source": "fct_invoices", "stale": false }],
"trust_score": {
"tier": "provisional",
"reasons": ["gross_revenue: assertion unverified (pass/fail not yet persisted)"]
}
}
}The agent sees which definition answered, which rules shaped the SQL, and why the number is only provisional, so it can caveat the answer instead of presenting it as settled.
The three layers
canonic's context lives in three committed surfaces: plain files in your git repo, reviewed like code.
Layer | File | Answers | Owned by |
Semantics |
| "How do I query this safely?" | auto-maintained |
Knowledge |
| "What does this mean to the business?" | auto-maintained |
Contracts |
| "Which definition is canonical, and what must the answer obey?" | human-owned |
Changes how the SQL runs โ semantics. A human needs it to trust the answer โ knowledge. Governs which definition is authoritative โ contracts. See Concepts: the three layers.
Quickstart
canonic needs Python 3.13 or newer (uv fetches it for you).
uvx canonic --version # try it without installing
uv tool install canonic # persistent, global command
pip install canonic # without uv
docker pull ghcr.io/mischuh/canonic:latest # CI, headless, air-gappedThe fastest path uses local connectors, no server, no network. Point at a SQLite .db or DuckDB .duckdb/CSV/Parquet file:
canonic setup
The wizard names your project, connects a source, optionally configures an LLM, drafts your semantics from the live schema, then runs a real query and shows the answer with its freshness and definition. A server-based database or an LLM provider needs a credential in an environment variable (or a file: reference) before you run canonic setup, because canonic never stores secrets in canonic.yaml directly.
You now have a working context layer committed to your repo:
canonic overview # what's askable
canonic query --metrics revenue --dimensions order_date # ask it
canonic review && canonic status # review what it draftedAir-gapped install and offline wheels: Installation.
Connect your agent (MCP)
canonic exposes its tools over a local, on-demand MCP server, verified with Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex:
canonic mcp start{
"mcpServers": {
"canonic": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": ["canonic", "mcp", "start", "--project", "/path/to/canonic/examples/rental", "--suggestions"]
}
}
}GUI-launched clients (Claude Desktop, Cursor) don't source your shell profile, so pass connection credentials via the config's env field, not export.
See Connecting your agent for remote and enterprise deployment (--transport http, per-client bearer tokens) and the tools reference. To see masking, run_sql gating and tenancy scoping applied to a real identity, scripts/local_idp runs the marketplace example behind a local Keycloak: walkthrough.
Example projects
examples/ ships seven ready-to-run projects, each with a guide:
Example | Backend | Shows |
DuckDB | dbt manifest with MetricFlow models as evidence | |
Postgres | the full loop: guardrails, finality, Notion and dbt evidence, observability | |
SQLite | cross-fact fanout and a NULL-handling guardrail, no setup needed | |
DuckDB | every metric binding kind, all guardrail kinds, finality, assertions | |
DuckDB | a geography dimension chain and ratio metrics | |
SQLite | tenant scoping, role-based access and column masking | |
SQLite | context bootstrapped from an Apache Ossie model | |
DuckDB | the same questions answered by dbt MetricFlow and canonic: count distinct, averages, guardrails |
What you can rely on
Read-only. canonic never mutates your warehouse.
Propose-only, refuse-and-ask. Every change is a reviewable diff; ambiguous or unsafe answers get a structured reason, not a guess.
No LLM in the answer path. Queries compile deterministically. An LLM is optional and only drafts context during setup, four providers supported (Anthropic, OpenAI, any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, GitHub Copilot), see Configuring an LLM.
Local-first & air-gapped-capable. Run entirely on your machine; nothing has to leave your network.
For developers
uv sync # install with dev dependencies
uv run pytest tests/ -x # tests, including the golden suite
uv run ruff check . && uv run ruff format --check .
uv run mypy canonic/Layout.
canonic/is the package (compiler, connectors, contracts, ingestion, knowledge, MCP server, trust, instrumentation),tests/mirrors it,examples/holds the sample projects.Extension points. Connectors register with the
ConnectorFactoryby capability (introspect_schema,run_read_only_sql,extract_definitions,extract_evidence), and short-lived credentials plug in through theCredentialProviderRegistry.Stable contract. The serving contract is versioned (the
contract_infoMCP tool,CONTRACT_CHANGELOG.md), andtests/golden/locks compiled SQL and executed numbers for the examples.Contributing. Conventional Commits, the golden-suite workflow and the contract-change process are in CONTRIBUTING.md.
Documentation
Quickstart: first answer in minutes.
Concepts: the three layers, the compiler, contracts, tenancy.
CLI reference: every command, flag by flag.
MCP / agent integration: wiring canonic into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or any MCP client.
Guides: the seven example projects and the warehouse walkthroughs.
Reference: error codes and the full
canonic.yamlconfig schema.
License
Business Source License 1.1. Free for non-commercial, personal, evaluation, educational and developmental use. Commercial use needs a separate license. The licensed version converts to Apache 2.0 on July 17, 2030.
This server cannot be deployed
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Let AI agents query data and act across all your business apps via MCP.
One governed MCP endpoint for 30+ business systems. Read-only, source-cited answers.
Query your org's data in natural language โ read-only MCP access to SQL, NoSQL, files & warehouses.
Get better answers from business data. Serve data from CRMs, databases, ERPs or SaaS apps via Dataddo MCP, which adds needed context and descriptions to improve correctness and reduce confidently wrong answers.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query live schema, lineage, and query-context across data warehouses, dbt projects, orchestration systems, and BI tools via MCP tools.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceTurns warehouse/lakehouse tables into a governed entity-relationship knowledge graph exposed through MCP, enabling AI agents to answer multi-table business questions without hard-coded SQL or large schema prompts.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceServes an automatically inferred semantic layer from your warehouse over MCP, enabling AI agents to query with correct business context, joins, and filters.3Functional Source , Version 1.1, ALv2 Future
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables enterprise AI agents to query governed data lineage, PII-aware schema documentation, and semantic metadata from SQL logs via MCP, with role-based access and vector search.MIT