Skip to main content
Glama
FasenChen

StreamXpress MCP Server

by FasenChen
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to StreamXpress MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Apple TV MCP

      trevor-nichols
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to control a set-top streaming device and visually navigate its interface, including opening apps, managing playback, entering text, adjusting volume and power, sending remote input, and capturing screenshots for observation and verification.
      14
      MIT

    • Roku MCP Server

      maskelog
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to develop, test, and certify Roku applications by providing direct control over device functions like app deployment, remote input, and SceneGraph inspection. It supports automated workflows including real-time log collection, media monitoring, and certification verification.
      1
      -

    • roku-dev-mcp

      voidxela
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to develop, deploy, navigate, inspect, and debug Roku BrightScript and SceneGraph applications with direct hardware control.
      -

    • Pro Tools MCP Server

      skrul
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to control Pro Tools via the PTSL gRPC API, providing session management, timeline navigation, track control, clip management, editing, markers, transport, audio analysis, and more.
      18
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: connection management, port scanning/selection, file opening, playout start/stop, status retrieval, and parameter configuration. No two tools appear to do the same thing.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (e.g., scan_ports, select_port, open_file, set_rate). The few single-word verbs (start, stop, connect, disconnect) are acceptable but slightly inconsistent with the underscore-separated verb_noun style.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools is well within the ideal range for a device control server. Each tool covers a necessary aspect of playout control, and there is no bloat or redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core lifecycle: connect, configure port, open file, start/stop, query status, and adjust parameters. Notable gaps include lack of pause/resume or file listing, but these are not critical for the apparent primary workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources