The two tools target clearly distinct functions: one fetches an audit signal, the other evaluates LP pool risk. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: get_latest_audit and evaluate_pool. This is predictable and uniform.

With only 2 tools, the server sits at the thin end of the scale. The scope appears narrow, so the count is plausible, but it feels slightly sparse for a 'decision engine' that might warrant additional supporting functions.

For the apparent purpose of providing audit signals and LP risk evaluation, the two tools cover the core workflow without obvious dead ends. Minor gaps may exist, such as historical audit retrieval or pool parameters, but the essential actions are covered.