Skip to main content
Glama
Faouzi122

Arsenal Decision Engine

by Faouzi122
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Arsenal Decision Engine

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • quiver-risk-brain

      Tristan-tech-ai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      The verifiable risk engine for autonomous agents: deterministic, self-verifying financial calculations that an agent can delegate and prove. It covers liquidation and funding, position sizing and risk of ruin, options Greeks and margin, LP divergence, treasury concentration and depeg, execution quality checks, plus intelligence on options, DeFi, prediction markets, and transaction safety analysis.
      10 npm
      1
      MIT

    • riskstate-mcp

      Riskstate
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Deterministic risk governance for crypto trading agents. 5-level policy engine with position sizing, leverage limits, and trade blocking. One tool: get_risk_policy. Supports BTC and ETH.
      4
      227 npm
      1
      MIT

    • WETH

      ayushkumar2601
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to analyze Ethereum wallets, simulate transactions, and draft transfers with deterministic policy and risk scoring, requiring human approval before on-chain execution.
      7 npm
      ISC

    • LevelField MCP Server

      Aji-Q
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to assess structural information-asymmetry risk in prediction-market event contracts from contract text alone, with deterministic scoring and no LLM API dependency.
      99
      MIT

    • Pharos Sentinel

      mattcrypted
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Evaluates on-chain risk for Pharos agents before executing transactions, providing verdicts (safe/caution/dangerous) and risk-bounded execution plans via Foundry cast reads.
      MIT No Attribution
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools target clearly distinct functions: one fetches an audit signal, the other evaluates LP pool risk. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: get_latest_audit and evaluate_pool. This is predictable and uniform.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server sits at the thin end of the scale. The scope appears narrow, so the count is plausible, but it feels slightly sparse for a 'decision engine' that might warrant additional supporting functions.

    Completeness4/5

    For the apparent purpose of providing audit signals and LP risk evaluation, the two tools cover the core workflow without obvious dead ends. Minor gaps may exist, such as historical audit retrieval or pool parameters, but the essential actions are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources